Wednesday, August 26, 2020

Two Unlikely Women in British Literature

Two Unlikely Women in British Literature Rachael Haines British Literature Summer Term Critical Essay Allison, the Wife of Bath in Chaucer’s Canterbury Tales and Lady Macbeth from Shakespeare’s Macbeth, are two striking ladies in writing who surrender the desires for society on ladies of the time and rather use control to pick up force and control. These two ladies, Allison and Lady Macbeth are critical female characters since they speak to change in their individual social orders both in their conduct and in their normal cultural roles.Allison, a fabric producer, lives in a period following the Norman Invasion. The Anglo-Saxon ways including the more in any event, playing field between genders offered approach to â€Å"frenchified†, male-predominant lifestyle. Ladies were relied upon to serve their spouses yet Allison anticipates that her men should serve her. Woman Macbeth additionally acts out of the blue when she assumes control over things and doesn’t go about as an accommodating and honorable lady should. Following the conveyance of the three witches’ message to Macbeth in regards to his destiny, Lady Macbeth in a split second acknowledged what is being compromised and urgently needs to change his fate.Instead of acting respectably and as a hireling to her better half, she devises an arrangement wherein she will submit regicide and kill Duncan herself. She rather chooses to persuade Macbeth to submit the homicide himself. From the start, the Wife of Bath may appear to be on the side of woman's rights yet Chaucer depicts her in express manners when he expounds on her hood, her red dress, her hips and especially her gapped teeth which were generally connected with desire during her time. Allison puts on a show of being experienced and proficient about men since she has had five husbands.Unlike the ladies of her time, Allison is predominant. She utilizes her body and sexuality to control and oversee her men. During her fift h marriage even a horrendous hit to the head on account of her significant other doesn’t stop her controlling conduct and she lies on the floor as though she is dead. She drastically professes to be dead from the blow so as to prompt worry with her significant other. Woman Macbeth rapidly hops into the main part of things when she finds out about her husband’s anticipated destiny. She and her significant other both need the riches and power.Lady Macbeth devises an arrangement to kill the ruler with the goal that satisfaction of the witches’ message probably won't be met. Woman Macbeth is edgy. She feels her better half is too faithful and not merciless enough; excessively feeble. Woman Macbeth, albeit intense and driven perceives that she isn’t extremely able in her present condition of doing kill. Rather she requests the otherworldly capacity to be unsexed; to free herself of female characteristics so she can kill the ruler. Rather than increasing extrao rdinary force, Lady Macbeth persuades her better half to carry out the murder†¦freeing her from the weight of really perpetrating the crime.Lady Macbeth turns out to be simply the impetus for her husband’s crazy deadly conduct. The two ladies use control to get what they need and the two ladies live outside the cultural standards of their time. Be that as it may, Allison at last is a considerably more solid character. Allison introduces herself as an advertiser of sexual opportunity and not an advertiser of women's liberation. She utilizes her sexual aptitude and her body to pick up what she implies that ladies need most; power over their spouses when subjugation by the lady was normal. For Allison, her sexuality was her greatest stun factor.At initially meet, Lady Macbeth paints a picture of herself as a contemptible sovereign; both solid and yearning to hold her capacity. However it isn’t some time before we understand that Lady Macbeth can't deal with the blame related with being a homicide and submitting regicide despite the fact that her hands didn’t really submit the homicide, she pushed and bolstered her significant other in finishing the demonstrations. In a little while, the force hungry binge starts to negatively affect the aggressive Lady Macbeth. The crowd observers her falling apart wellbeing and mental steadiness as she pointlessly attempts to disavow the guilt.In this correlation, I find that while the two ladies were ladies outside of the standards of society they conveyed a change. They may have spoken to the disappointment that ladies and men may have felt over the ever-changing society that the two journalists persevered. Be that as it may, with respect to our driving women, Allison is an a lot more grounded character who can persevere through the evil impacts of her control, while Lady Macbeth succumbs to them in her fast destruction. Neither of these strong, life-changing women were regular women of their time.

Saturday, August 22, 2020

Kant and the Horseman in the Sky Essay

I accept that Immanuel Kant would see Carter Druse’s activity of shooting his dad as good. Kant was an ethicist that accepted that profound quality depended working, that morals is supreme, not contingent, and depends on reason, not emotions. (Pojman, Vaughn 309) That is actually the situation that Ambrose Bierce composes Carter Druse into in the short story A Horseman in the Sky. I feel there are a few pieces of the story that flip to and fro between being good and not being good or possibly the better words would be that it is amusing on numerous levels. The story starts with Carter Druse being alluded to as a criminal for being sleeping on his post: Â'The cluster of shrub in which the criminal lay’ (Pojman, Vaughn 356) yet some may contend that a child shooting his dad is improper and criminal regardless of in wartime or not. With regards to Kantian reasoning and philosphy, I think it is the ideal case of setting aside feelings and putting together a choice soley with respect to reason and obligation. It’s amusing that what Â'rouses him from his condition of crime’ (Pojman, Vaughn 358) is the pony that his dad is on. He delays to shoot the aggressor on account of the excellence of the scene; the pony, the valley, and the sky. Carter Druse contemplates in the event that it is so awful to execute the foe during war. (Pojman, Vaughn 358) Kant felt that it was obligation to the It is unexpected that Carter Druse’s choice to not get the Legions together with his dad could be viewed as a disloyalty of obligation to his dad and to his Deontological ethicist which depends on the job.

Saturday, August 15, 2020

Admitted Student Summer Email Series COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY - SIPA Admissions Blog

Admitted Student Summer Email Series COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY - SIPA Admissions Blog This week the Office of Student Affairs at SIPA started to send a series of emails to admitted students who have paid an enrollment deposit for fall 2009.   The emails contain important information pertaining to enrollment and preparation for classes in the fall. I just wanted to make an annoucement because the emails will be coming from a different address than the Admissions Office at SIPA.   If you have yet to receive an email please check your spam or junk mail folders and ensure that your settings allow for messages from sipa_osa@columbia.edu.

Sunday, May 24, 2020

An Overview of Third-Wave Feminism

What historians refer to as first-wave feminism arguably began in the late 18th century with the publication of Mary Wollstonecrafts Vindication of the Rights of Woman (1792), and ended with the ratification of the Twentieth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which protected a womans right to vote. First-wave feminism was concerned primarily with establishing, as a point of policy, that women are human beings and should not be treated like property. The Second Wave The second wave of feminism emerged in the wake of World War II, during which many women entered the workforce, and would have arguably ended with the ratification of the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA), had it been ratified. The central focus of the second wave was on total gender equality —  women as a group having the same social, political, legal, and economic rights that men have. Rebecca Walker and the Origins of Third-Wave Feminism Rebecca Walker, a 23-year-old, bisexual African-American woman born in Jackson, Mississippi, coined the term third-wave feminism in a 1992 essay. Walker is in many ways a living symbol of the way that second-wave feminism has historically failed to incorporate the voices of many young women, non-heterosexual women, and women of color. Women of Color Both first-wave and second-wave feminism represented movements that existed alongside, and at times in tension with, civil rights movements for people of color — a slight majority of whom happen to be women. But the struggle always seemed to be for the rights of white women, as represented by the womens liberation movement, and black men, as represented by the civil rights movement. Both movements, at times, could have been legitimately accused of relegating women of color to asterisk status. Lesbians, Bisexual Women, and Transgender Women For many second-wave feminists, non-heterosexual women were seen as an embarrassment to the movement. The great feminist activist Betty Friedan, for example, coined the term lavender menace in 1969 to refer to what she considered the harmful perception that feminists are lesbians. She later apologized for the remark, but it accurately reflected the insecurities of a movement that was still very heteronormative in many ways. Low-Income Women First- and second-wave feminism also tended to emphasize the rights and opportunities of middle-class women over poor and working-class women. The debate over abortion rights, for example, centers on laws that affect a womans right to choose an abortion — but economic circumstances, which generally play a more significant role in such decisions today, are not necessarily taken into account. If a woman has the legal right to terminate her pregnancy, but chooses to exercise that right because she cant afford to carry a pregnancy to term, is this really a scenario that protects reproductive rights? Women in the Developing World First- and second-wave feminism, as movements, were largely confined to industrialized nations. But third-wave feminism takes a global perspective — not by merely attempting to colonize developing nations with Western practices, but by empowering women to actualize change, to gain power and equality, within their own cultures and their own communities and with their own voices. A Generational Movement Some second-wave feminist activists have questioned the need for a third wave. Others, both inside and outside of the movement, disagree with respect to what the third wave represents. Even the general definition  provided above may not accurately describe the objectives of all third-wave feminists.But its important to realize that third-wave feminism is a generational term — it refers to how the feminist struggle manifests itself in the world today. Just as second-wave feminism represented the diverse and sometimes competing for interests of feminists who struggled together under the banner of womens liberation, third-wave feminism represents a generation that has begun with the achievements of the second wave. We can only hope that the third wave will be so successful as to necessitate the fourth wave — and we can only imagine what that fourth wave might look like.

Wednesday, May 13, 2020

Beauty and The Beast Free Essay Example, 2000 words

The two characters, Belle and the Beast, were initially cast against each other though despite the presence of a persistent suitor, Belle was genuinely single and is therefore open to romance. Although the plot seemed obvious because of the title, the movie did its part in showing the development of the characters own selves before developing a love for each other. It would be prudent to note that the hideous form of the Beast was a punishment from an otherwise wayward prince. Also, it can be seen that the imprisonment of Belle was likewise a watershed event in her life that has opened up herself to be more caring and sensitive to other people. In fact, getting to know Beast in a deeper sense can only be the possible explanation for such a beauty to fall for the beast (Minow 2007). A Beastly Beauty in itself The film itself was a romance in the making. Berardinelli (1991) argues that it was the best animated movie that was ever made. However, he concedes that the Lion King was by far the highest grossing Disney film, the story and cinematography coupled with the astounding soundtrack and musical has pushed the movie to great heights. We will write a custom essay sample on Beauty and The Beast or any topic specifically for you Only $17.96 $11.86/pageorder now However, despite being an animated film, the movie did not really bank on animation though it was fairly respectable during that time. With the developments in technology, this pales in comparison to animated hits of the new century (Pierce 2001). Probably among its greatest strengths was the superb musical that accompanied the film which was fairly easy to remember and even hum to ones content. One of the crucial success factors of the film was the casting of Belle as a strong-willed lass that is a strong deviation from the otherwise passive character that Beauty was in the original story. In fact, Belle was praised for veering away from the usually sexist themes portrayed by heroines of Disney movies such as Ariel in the Little Mermaid. Cummins (1995) however argued that the movie still follows the same old format that a woman’s happiness can only be possible, and last ever after, when she finds a prince. In so doing, the film seem to have a beastly undertone in its beauty which seem to permeate the minds of little girls and those hopeless romantics that in order to find the happiness that they desire, they must embark on a personal expedition to search for her prince. However, this argument seems unfounded though since Belle herself was a strong willed and educated girl. It was portrayed that she has a voracious appetite for books and is not easily swayed by the swooning men of her village, even the very persistent Gaston.

Wednesday, May 6, 2020

A Local Restaurant and Western Restaurant Free Essays

When trying to decide where to dine, either at a local restaurant or at a western restaurant, patrons should consider several aspects that concern these dining places. Some of these aspects include the food selection, the service provided and the ambience of each restaurant. When we talk about the food selection, both the restaurant must have a variety of menus as this is one that captured the quality required to be on every restaurant. We will write a custom essay sample on A Local Restaurant and Western Restaurant or any similar topic only for you Order Now However, as we all know, Malaysian people are of different race. So, usually, we can find three types of food at local restaurant such as nasi lemak of Malay cuisine, Chinese cuisine such as Char Kway Teow and Indian cuisine like roti canai. For western restaurant, although their foods recently are influence by the local food but its main foods are usually steak, chicken chop and spaghetti. Besides that, the western restaurants usually are sequential in serving their foods which are the appetizer, main course and desserts. On the other hand, the local restaurant is only having the main course and only some of the local restaurants provide dessert like cendol or ais kacang. Secondly, when going to restaurant, we usually are comparing the service of the restaurant with the others. So, when comparing local restaurant with western restaurant, western restaurant will give a good impression to us. Western restaurants usually employ more waiter and waitress that are trained well whereas the waiter and waitress of local restaurant are usually shorthanded and we even can find some of them act rude to the customers. Due to more number of waiters, the food service for western restaurant is better than local restaurant where we can experience of waiting for so long for our foods at local restaurant. Furthermore, the waiters of western are usually standardized with their own uniform as the badge for the restaurant while local restaurant’s waiters are not provided with uniform by the restaurant. As the conclusion, we can say that western restaurant give more efficient service than the local restaurant. Another difference between western restaurant and local restaurant is the ambience. Both western and local restaurant will provide a place with relaxed and soothing environment to the customers so that they will feel comfortable to dine. However, western restaurant have quiet ambience with soft music sets whereas the local restaurant is a bit noisy and usually not included with musical set instead some are included by a karaoke set. Furthermore, western restaurants are designed with modern and creative high class decorative ffects to attract attention and impress the customers. In contrast, local restaurants are simply decorated, but have so many atmospheres which are compatible with its modest budget. However, both are design and decorate well so that the customers can look around and find a new item and experience if they have to wait. Thus, to decide whether to dine at a local restaurant or western restaurant, factors such as the food selection, ambience of the restaurant and the service provided should be taken into consideration. How to cite A Local Restaurant and Western Restaurant, Essay examples

Monday, May 4, 2020

The Impeachment Trial Of President Clinton Essay free essay sample

, Research Paper President William Jefferson Clinton is the 3rd president in our state # 8217 ; s history to confront the Constitutional menace of impeachment and merely the 2nd president to of all time be impeached by the U.S. House of Representatives. Andrew Johnson was impeached by the House of Representatives in 1868 for go againsting the Tenure of Office Act of 1867 when he tried to throw out the Secretary of War, Edwin M. Stanton ( Short History ) . Richard Nixon resigned from the Presidency before he was charged with condemnable confederacy in the Watergate Scandal ( Short History ) . Article II, Section 4 of the Constitution sets the evidences for impeachment. The Constitution provinces: # 8220 ; The President, the Vice President, and all other Civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors # 8221 ; ( Renstrom 458 ) . The Clinton Impeachment Trial is unlike the Johnson and Nixon instances because he did non touch off any intra-governmental struggles like Johnson, nor did he take portion in a condemnable confederacy as Nixon did. Some Democrats question if the Clinton Articles of Impeachment are valid harmonizing to Article II, Section 4 of the Constitution. William Clinton began his early political calling as many politicians do. He was a bright pupil throughout his old ages in high school, college, and eventually jurisprudence school. A Rhodes bookman and Yale Law School alumnus, Clinton seemed to be on the right route to success. He served as Arkansas # 8217 ; Attorney General and Governor of the province for five footings. Clinton revived the Democratic Party and led it to two footings of White House control through the presidential term. However, Clinton # 8217 ; s lift to power took a incorrect bend when he was accused of sexually hassling a former Arkansas province employee named Paula Jones ( L.A. Times ) . Jones foremost spoke out against Clinton in 1994, but it wasn # 8217 ; t until January of 1998 that the president would hold to reply inquiries in his defence against Jones. It was besides at this clip that the independent advocate, Kenneth Starr, who had been look intoing Clinton for the Whitewater existent estate matter n ow claimed to be spread outing his probe. Starr alleged that a former 24-year old White House houseman named Monica Lewinsky had been asked to lie, in the Jones torment instance, about if she had sexual dealingss with the president by Clinton himself and friend Vernon Jordan ( L.A. Times ) . Starr began to dig deeper until he had adequate grounds against the president. On September 9th, 1998, Kenneth Starr delivered his expressed 453-paged study to the U.S. House of Representatives. For a president to be impeached at that place must foremost be a formal accusal brought up by the House of Representatives ( Short History ) . Article I, Section 2 of the Constitution states that the House of Representatives # 8220 ; shall hold the exclusive Power of Impeachment # 8221 ; ( Renstrom 452 ) . By December 12, the House Judiciary Committee had approved four impeachment articles that would travel to the floor of the house for a ballot. The four articles of impeachment against Clinton were: Perjury before a expansive jury, bearing false witness in the Paula Jones instance, obstructor of justness, and an maltreatment of power ( U.S News 23 ) . Even though the president # 8217 ; s attorneies had done a sensible occupation at supporting him in forepart of the House Judiciary Committee, the articles passed because the bulk of the commission members are Republicans, and is chaired by Representative Henry Hyde from Illinois. Prominent Congressional Democratic leaders like Sena te Majority leader Tom Daschle and House Minority leader Richard Gephardt sought after a Congressional animadversion for President Clinton alternatively of the full impeachment. However, the Democrats did non acquire a animadversion declaration for Clinton before the ballot took topographic point in the House of Representatives ( U.S. News 21 ) . For any of the articles to go through, a bulk of the House was necessary ( U.S. News 104 ) . House of Representatives Resolution 611, the impeachment of William Jefferson Clinton for high offenses and misdemeanours, took topographic point on December 19th. The 435-member House of Representatives voted for two of the four impeachment articles. The two articles that passed were obstructor of justness and bearing false witness before the expansive jury ( U.S. News ) . The bearing false witness charge against Clinton passed 228-206 and the obstructor of justness charge passed 221-212 ( Houston Chronicle ) . Although the House Republicans had wo n a triumph by acquiring two articles of impeachment approved, the Senate would hear the balance of the instance against President Clinton. As stated in Article I, Section 3 of the United States Constitution: # 8220 ; The Senate shall hold the exclusive Power to seek all Impeachments # 8221 ; ( Renstrom 452 ) . This subdivision of the Constitution besides sets up some extra guidelines that the Senate must follow. The Senate must move as the jury and # 8220 ; be on Oath or Affirmation. # 8221 ; Besides, the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court is instructed to p reside over the test. â€Å" ? no Person shall be convicted without the Concurrence of two tierces of the Members present† pertains to the figure that it takes to make a strong belief ( Renstrom 452 ) . On January 7th, Republicans discourse how the test will continue, which lasts for a hebdomad. Get downing on January 14th, the 13 prosecuting officers of the instance, called impeachment test directors, started their gap remarks. The test directors were the Republican Representatives that serve on the House Judiciary Committee. The Judiciary Committee Chairman, Henry Hyde, was besides the caput test director. Along with Mr. Hyde were Representatives Bob Barr from Georgia, Charles Canandy from Florida, Lindsey Graham from South Carolina, Asa Hutchinson from Arkansas, James Sensenbrenner signifier Wisconsin, Steve Buyer from Indiana, George Gekas from Pennsylvania, Ed Bryant from Tennessee, Bill McCollum from Florida, Steve Chabot from Ohio, Christopher Cannon from Utah, and Jame s Rogan from California. This all-male, all Republican, all-lawyer squad argued that taking President Clinton was necessary to protect the regulation of jurisprudence and safeguard the â€Å"covenant of trust† between the president and the state ( Clinton Under Fire ) . The attorneies that defended President Clinton were main White House advocate Charles Ruff, David Kendall, Cheryl Mills, Nicole Seigelman, and former Senator and Clinton friend Dale Bumpers ( Clinton Under Fire ) . 74-year old Chief Justice William Rehnquist officiated the test as instructed by the Constitution. Previously, Rehnquist had written an history of the Andrew Johnson impeachment test called Grand Inquests ( Clinton Under Fire ) . The biggest struggle between Republicans and Democrats in this test revolved around informants. Originally, the House directors sought after Monica Lewinsky to attest, along with Vernon Jordan, and Sidney Blumenthal. Jordan was brought in because he had purportedly asked Lewinsky to lie under curse at the Paula Jones instance deposition she gave, denying that she had had any sexual dealingss with President Clinton. The test directors felt that by holding Sidney Blumenthal as a informant, it would assist the instance against Clinton # 8217 ; s obstructor of justness ( Clinton Under Fire ) . For about a month, Republicans and Democrats, House directors and White House attorneies, pitched their scheme for winning. On February 12th the Senate reached a finding of fact after three yearss of considering. William Jefferson Clinton was acquitted on the two counts of bearing false witness before the expansive jury and obstructor of justness. The Republicans did ill in the test. They control the Senate by 10 seats and did non acquire a bulk on either charge. The first article of impeachment, bearing false witness, was a 50-50-split ballot. The obstructor of justness charge was 45 for strong belief and 55 against strong belief ( Houston Chronicle ) . Whether or non President Clinton acted in an immoral manner towards Monica Lewinsky is non every bit of import as the fact the he likely lied to the American people. Is he is genuinely guilty of the impeachment charges brought against him in the House of Representatives? Clinton did emerge from the test with a repute for stating prevarications and now his presidential term will stay tarnished until he leaves office. Unfortunately, Bill Clinton misused the trust of America as a whole. As Representative Henry Hyde asked, # 8220 ; If you can non believe the president, who can you believe? # 8221 ; ( Clinton Under Fire ) . For some ground, Clinton maintained a just blessing evaluation among the people of the state. His blessing during the test was mostly due to the fact that the economic system has remained better than it has been in old ages. So what are Americans believing about politicians? Let the president prevarication and allow Congress utilize one million millions of dollars on a pointless test? Although the test and other facets of Clinton # 8217 ; s private life are everyday, the fact that all three subdivisions of our federal authorities came together at one clip is. Gerson, Michael J. # 8220 ; End Games. # 8221 ; US News A ; World Report 21 December 1998: 20-29 Gergen, David. # 8220 ; It # 8217 ; s clip for a cease fire. # 8221 ; US News A ; World Report 4 January 1999: 16-29 Renstrom, Peter G. Constitutional Law and Young Adults. ABC-CLIO. Santa Barbara: 1996 # 8220 ; Impeachment Trial Ends. # 8221 ; Houston Chronicle. Online. Internet. 2 Feb. 1999. Available: www.chron.com. # 8220 ; The Impeachment Trial: Key Players. # 8221 ; Houston Chronicle. Online. Internet. 1 Jan. 1999. Available: www.chron.com. # 8220 ; Clinton Under Fire. # 8221 ; BBC News Online. Available: news.bbc.co.uk/ hi/english/events/clinton_under_fire/profiles/newsid_168000/ 168540.stm. # 8220 ; A Short History of Impeachment Before Clinton. # 8221 ; Available: infoplease.lycos.com/spot/impeach.html. Los Angeles Times: hypertext transfer protocol: //www.latimes.com/HOME/NEWS/REPORTS/SCANDAL/ PATHWAY/tpointframe.htm. January 31, 1999.